|
Pakistan Diary
Naresh Nadeem
From People's Democracy, Volume 11, 12 & 13
OVER to Lahore it
was just a 50-minute flight. Nor does the Samjhauta Express take anything
more than 10 hours. And yet, even though being so close, the two countries
have been so distant from one another since the partition!
But the impression
we all had was that, given the people’s pressure and initiative, this
distance can well be overcome in no time. And this the first ever
communist delegation to Pakistan after 1947 has confirmed beyond doubt.
Led by CPI(M)
general secretary Harkishan Singh Surjeet and his CPI counterpart A B
Bardhan, the five member delegation was accompanied by a five member media
team from dailies Ganashakti and Prajashakti and from TV
channels Akash Bangla and Kairali.
The delegation
visited Pakistan at the invitation of Joint Left Front (JLF), comprising
three parties. These are the Communist Party of Pakistan (CPP), Communist
Mazdoor Kisan Party (CMKP) and Labour Party (LP). As for us, none except
Surjeet had ever been to Pakistan earlier.
FEBRUARY 24
The warm attitude of
the Left forces in Pakistan towards the delegation, and towards the Indian
Left in general, became clear as soon as the delegation landed at Allama
Iqbal International Airport of Lahore at about 6 p m PST. While the
delegation was still inside the airport, protocol officers told us that a
big crowd was waiting for us outside and that a bevy of media persons was
also there in the wings. As the rush had increased with the arrival back
of a big group of Haj pilgrims, the officials chose to take us to the
state lounge first.
The commotion
increased as soon as the delegation, with Surjeet in front, came out. The
rush became unmanageable. For, every single soul in that crowd of 500 plus
wanted to meet the comrades from India and, most of all, to have a glimpse
of the person who is not only a towering figure of the communist movement
but was also active in Lahore in pre-partition days. Or, to put it
figuratively, Surjeet was (naturally) one of their own. And these comrades
were not from Lahore alone; they had come from all parts of the country,
even from far flung areas.
Surjeet,
Bardhan being welcomed at Lahore airport
And the Pakistan
media too was aware of the status of CPI(M) general secretary plus his
Lahore background. This was why reporters and cameramen rushed forward to
have a byte, though it created a problem for the comrades there, whose
main concern was how to protect an aged and frail Surjeet from getting
hurt.
This caused some
misunderstanding, and a bit of ruckus, as the media persons thought the
comrades were not allowing them to do their job. This unfortunate
misunderstanding prompted a small section of the media to announce a
boycott of the JLF programmes. It took the intervention of some senior
journalists, including SAFMA secretary general Imtiaz Alam, to get this
misunderstanding cleared.
Anyway, it took us
at least one hour and a half to reach 5 A Nisar Road, the house of Justice
Rashid Rehman (Retd) whose son, Taimur Rehman, is a member of the CMKP
Central Committee. The reception dinner, organised here, was attended by
persons from some media organisations as well, including the Geo channel,
the largest TV channel in the country. This channel prominently telecast
the interviews it had had with Surjeet and Bardhan.
The hosts included
CPP general secretary Qazi Imdad, CMKP chairman Sufi Abdul Khaliq Baloch
and general secretary Ejaz Ghani, Labour Party general secretary Shueb
Bhatti, Mansoor Saeed and Zafar (CPP), Taimur Rehman (CMKP), and Shabana
(LP), apart from others. A large number of Left cadres from various parts
of the country also attended the dinner.
FEBRUARY 25
The programme of the
day included a visit to the Mughalpura railway station at 8 a m. This is
the place where the police of the British raj spotted Surjeet, when he was
living underground in pre-partition days. They arrested and imprisoned
Surjeet, kept him in solitary confinement and tortured him. However, the
visit had to be cancelled as Surjeet was overtired because of the last
evening’s programmes.
But the delegation
did go to the Lahore Fort (Shahi Qila) at 10 a m PST. The fort was built
by Mughal emperor Jahangir who had a fascination for the city, so much so
that he spent his last days and died here. Shahdara, in the suburbs of
Lahore, is the place where his and Noor Jahan’s mausoleum still stands.
The main aim of
visiting the Shahi Qila was to see the Cell No. 3 where a young Surjeet
suffered solitary confinement for over three months. It was therefore very
natural if Surjeet sat for some time in front of the rubble that the Cell
No. 3 now is, re-living his pre-partition days in Lahore and talking to a
group of Pakistani comrades and also some non-party people who had
gathered there to see him.

IN SEARCH OF
THE PAST: Surjeet sitting before the ruins of Cell No. 3
Unfortunately, after
independence, various governments of Pakistan did not pay attention to
some of the historical sites and we found only a heap of rubble in place
of the cells. True, these cells were already in a dilapidated condition at
the time we are talking about. Yet, given historical sense, these could
certainly be preserved.
What could the
reason be? According to a local comrade who accompanied me, the reason was
that the government did not want to let remain anything reminding the
people of Shaheed Hasan Nasir. One may note here that even though the Left
is fragmented in the country, to all the Left groups Hasan Nasir stands as
a symbol of protest, as their martyr. Hasan Nasir belonged to Hyderabad (Deccan)
and had fought, along with Makhdoom Mohiuddin and others, in the Telangana
armed struggle. After independence, he migrated to Pakistan and soon
became, to the new ruling classes of the country, one of the most feared
communists in Pakistan. He was arrested in 1960, put in a cell in the Fort
and brutally tortured till he died. Today, there remains nothing of that
cell except a wall containing a small window.
A couple of other
comrades were similarly tortured to death in these cells. It was thus no
wonder that the Shahi Qila became a symbol of horror in the country.
The Fort complex
includes some other historic places as well. One of these is the Gurudwara
Dera Sahib where the whole delegation was received with saropas. On
one side of this shrine is the Guru Arjun Dev’s community kitchen (langar)
and adjacent to it stands Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s samadhi.
The complex also
houses Dr Iqbal’s mausoleum, and Shamim Faizee (CPI) and me made it a
point to visit the place. Several others of the Indian team accompanied.
While in the
Gurudwara, we met Faqeer Syed Ejazuddin whose ancestors were in charge of
Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s royal stores; he told us that he still has in his
custody some historically valuable items and documents belonging to that
period. By the way, the word Faqeer in his name gives a deceptive
impression.
Faqeer Sahib and his
family were also the hosts to a lunch that was organised in Lahore
Gymkhana on the same day, on behalf of the religious minorities in the
country. About a hundred souls or somewhat more, including a number of
prominent Hindu, Sikh and Christian citizens, attended this programme. I
was told that a few Qadiyanis had also come, but I could not meet any.
A unique aspect of
this programme was that we came to know about and see for ourselves two
booklets in Punjabi (Gurmukhi script) which Surjeet had written in
pre-partition days --- one in 1937 and the other, titled Lenin, in
1942. These are preserved in Dayal Singh Research Institute & Library,
Lahore, and its director, Dr Zafar Cheema, brought the original booklets
as well as their photocopies to the programme. After a brief introduction,
he presented the beautifully bound photocopies to Surjeet.
I had a chance to
take a glimpse of these booklets: originals as well as photocopies. The
1937 booklet (I am forgetting the title) carried the name “Harkishan
Singh;” it is evident that he had not become “Surjeet” by then. The other
he had published with his own money and it carried the inscription
“Surjeet & Company.”
Due to
indisposition, Surjeet could not attend the other two programmes on the
day --- a press conference at Lahore Press Club at 5 p m, and a reception
and dinner given by trade unions at 7 p m at Gulberg Industrial Area. CPI
general secretary A B Bardhan was the chief guest at both these places.
FEBRUARY 26
The whole of the
delegation, except three members, went by cars to Sahiwal (earlier called
Montgomery) where Surjeet spent several years of his jail life in pre-1947
period.
Incidentally, like
the Lahore Fort jail, this jail too had been notorious for the
ill-treatment that was meted out to prisoners, more so to political
prisoners. After 1947 too, a number of eminent figures were confined here
--- including revolutionary Urdu poet Faiz Ahmad Faiz during the
Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case days, and another revolutionary Urdu poet Habib
Jalib later.
While at Sahiwal,
Surjeet also addressed a mass meeting organised by the JLF.
Those who stayed
back in Lahore were A B Bardhan, Shamin Faizee and myself. We were picked
up by National Workers Party chairman Abid Hasan Minto and we had some
political discussion with him as well as lunch at his house in Model Town.
Later he took us to several parts of the city and these included a visit
to now non-existent Camp Jail where Bhagat Singh was lodged during the
Second Lahore Conspiracy Case (1929-31) and where he was hanged to death
along with Rajguru and Sukhdev. To our utter grief, however, nothing now
remains of this jail except a wall; even the gate from where the
Britishers slyly took out the bodies of these martyrs has been demolished.
This jail, we were told, was once so big that the jailer used to go from
one to another part in a bagghi (horse-drawn coach). But later the
greed of influential ruling party leaders got the whole jail demolished
and the whole land divided into plots and sold. Now, in place of the jail,
there stands a sprawling residential colony called Shadman.
After taking a look
at various parts of the city, we were taken to the house of Comrade C R
Aslam (95), a veteran of the movement in that part of the country ---
before as well as after the partition. Thereafter we were taken to the
SAFMA (South Asia Free Media Association) office and handed over to its
secretary general Imtiaz Alam.
The round of the
city ended with a visit to the late Faiz Ahmad Faiz’s house where we met
his daughters, Saleema and Muneeza, and their husbands. Saleema’s husband,
Shueb Hashmi, a professor of economics, has also been in Sahiwal jail.
Both of them later came to the reception and dinner at 5 A Nisar Road
where a host of media persons put their queries to Surjeet and Bardhan.
WHILE still at
Lahore, the delegation decided to somewhat deviate from the itinerary that
was worked out beforehand. The idea was to go to Nankana Sahib where Guru
Nanak, founder of the Sikh religion, was born. As most of us were not sure
whether we would at all be able to come to Pakistan again, we did not want
to miss this opportunity. But special permission for it had to be obtained
from Islamabad as none of us had a visa for Sheikhupura district, in which
Nankana Sahib is located. That did not pose a problem, though it took some
time.
FEBRUARY 27
This caused a bit of
disappointment to local comrades, as some of the programmes had to be
cancelled. These included a visit to the Camp Jail in Lahore, refreshment
arranged by the CPP office in Lahore, and a meeting with the JLF
leadership.
Sheikhupura district
is adjacent to Lahore, and it is said that Sheikhupura town was populated
by Emperor Jahangir whose childhood nickname was Sheikhu.
We avoided the route
via Sheikhupura town. Instead, bypassing Shahdara, we reached Nankana
Sahib, 78 km from Lahore, via Shaqarpur and Faizabad Mandi.
The journey was an
experience in itself. Here in India, the reality of the Vajpayee
government’s “India Shining” slogan was evident to anybody as soon as (s)he
took trouble to move a little distance out of Delhi, or any metropolitan
city for that matter. Going away from Lahore with all its five star
hotels, wide roads, neon signboards and what not, I had had a similar kind
of experience. As soon as we crossed the Ravi bridge, the road to Nankana
Sahib was just like any countryside road in eastern UP or Bihar. It was
broken in places, there were small potholes in it, and there were pools of
water alongside. Villages by the roadside gave a gloomy look, pucca
houses were few and far between, many of the houses were in a dilapidated
state, and the rural folk were in poor and some in tattered clothes.
I was miffed up by a
peculiar fact. Contrary to the impression communal forces here in India
have always tried to create, the government of Pakistan has been engaged
in the maintenance of Nankana Sahib gurudwara and several other gurudwaras.
Then, I asked myself, why didn’t they improve the road, widen it, make the
journey smooth? I told one of the local comrades accompanying us: if only
the road is improved and there is a further relaxation in visa
restrictions, Pakistan may well earn millions of dollars every year. The
very nature of the place would bring it on the international tourism map,
attracting a large number of Sikhs (and also some non-Sikhs) from India as
well as western countries.
Yet, to me it did
not come as a surprise. Places of international importance like Kushinagar
in India and Lumbini in Nepal have suffered callous neglect for decades,
just like Nankana Sahib has. Speaking once in Lahore, Surjeet stressed the
basic unity of Indian and Pakistani people by saying that we have the same
food items and same songs --- khana ek aur gana ek. One could well
add to it: the bureaucratic buddhi running these countries is also
the same.
One now hopes the
condition will noticeably improve once there is an Indo-Pak agreement to
link Nankana Sahib and other Sikh shrines in Pakistan with Amritsar.
Nankana Sahib, where
we were greeted with saropas, was among the places where a bitter
struggle was fought against the corrupt, pro-British mahants in the
1920s. Here, about 200 Sikhs led by Jathedar Lakshman Singh were gunned
down on February 21, 1921, in front of Mahant Narain Das. The self-serving
Akali leaders of today perhaps little realise what sacrifices their
predecessors had had to make to liberate their gurudwaras and to make
their gurudwara liberation struggle a vital part of the bigger liberation
struggle --- the national liberation struggle.
Then --- back to
Lahore. We had left Lahore at about 8:45 in the morning and we reached the
Tajmahal Reception Hall at five minutes to one. Well in time for the lunch
hosted by National Workers Party chairman Abid Hasan Minto. Taimur
Rehman’s bet was that we won’t be able to come back even till 1:30 to
attend the lunch, and he lost.
The main attraction
of this programme was a reunion of two friends after a gap of 58 long
years. Though C R Aslam (95) is in the NWP, he is a veteran of the Left
movement in Pakistan and is given due regard as such by all Left groups in
the country. Hence it was very natural that when he was brought to the
stage to meet Surjeet, the audience rose to give respect to the two
veterans, amid loud applause.
NWP is not a
constituent of the JLF that hosted our visit.
Incidentally, the
kisan wing of the NWP is organising an “international kisan conference” at
Toba Tek Singh on March 23 --- the same place and the same date on which
late Maulana Abdul Hameed Bhasani had organised a kisan conference in
1970. However, there was no gist in the news published in The Dawn
(March 1) that communist leaders from India had “accepted invitation” to
attend the event.
Organised by JLF in
the afternoon, the seminar on “Future of Socialism in South Asia” was
attended by a large number of activists, several of whom had come from
other parts of the country. The attendance was indeed so big that many had
to stand outside and many sat on floor inside the auditorium of Human
Rights Commission of Pakistan, situated in New Garden Town in Lahore. One
leader each from the JLF constituents, the CPI and the CPI(M) spoke on the
occasion. The presentations were interspersed with poetry recitals
throughout.
It was a different
look in late evening when Pakistan Chapter of the South Asia Free Media
Association (SAFMA) hosted a dinner for the delegation at Avari Hotel on
Mall Road. It was preceded by an interaction session with a dozen odd
intellectuals ---economists, political scientists, media persons and the
like. Surjeet did not attend the session as he needed some rest after the
whole day’s activity, and A B Bardhan had to reply the queries coming from
these intellectuals.
At least two hundred
souls attended the dinner, with the welcome function presided over by
SAFMA secretary general Imtiaz Alam and the proceedings were conducted by
renowned columnist Munnu Bhai. “Indian Left & Indo-Pak Reconciliation” was
the theme on which Surjeet and Bardhan were asked to express their views
and reply to the queries coming from the audience. A large number of JLF
workers were present on the occasion and their slogans and revolutionary
songs created an ambience rarely, if ever, seen in a five star hotel. Many
media organisations including Geo TV covered this SAFMA-organised event.
FEBRUARY 28
While Surjeet flew
to Islamabad in view of his age, the rest of the delegation negotiated the
372 km distance in cars and the media team accompanying us came by bus. It
was a broad and smooth motorway that, at places, passes through hills in a
serpentine fashion. The weather was pleasant, and cars ran at 100 km an
hour. A vanload of CMKP workers also came from Lahore to Islamabad.
The first programme
in the capital city of Islamabad was a lunch hosted by CPP on its
outskirts. The house belongs to Engineer Jameel Malik who was the CPP
candidate for National Assembly against the present prime minister,
Shaukat Aziz. Malik mustered only 1,400 odd votes in this poll when the
PPP candidate accused the military of having engineered rigging in order
to ensure the victory of its chosen candidate for prime minister’s post.
Yet, Malik’s candidature served the purpose the party had in view. It
created a sort of sensation in the country and sent the message across
that the Left was not dead in Pakistan. We in India may not be able to
fathom the full significance of this message. But it was a big thing in
Pakistan where the landlord-military-clergy combine had assured themselves
and their masters abroad that they had done away with the Left!
Malik’s candidature
was a boost also to the liberals who were badly marginalised, if not
decimated, by the same combine. The story is the same as in India. Here,
if the RSS-variety and other fundamentalists are dead opposed to
communists, they do not tolerate the liberals and progressives either. To
that extent, communists and liberals have a common enemy and a common
cause --- here as well as there.
Rawalpindi, or in
short Pindi as the local people call it, was the capital of Pakistan till
1964 when the construction of Islamabad was completed. Population-wise,
Pindi is the third biggest city in the country. Though the two cities are
adjacent and one is not able to judge where one ends and the other starts,
they are two worlds quite apart. Contrary to the well-planned and
modernised Islamabad with a population of only 7 lakhs, Pindi is an old,
highly unplanned and overcrowded city.
Reaching our
destination --- Rawalpindi Press Club --- involved a bit of trouble as our
driver was from Lahore and did not know much about Pindi roads. This meant
we had to pass through several roads and lanes in the city, unnecessarily,
but this way we also saw a few places we could not have seen otherwise.
These included the road where the JKLF, Azad Kashmir Mahaz, and various
other militant groups have their offices. We were told that it is the
government of Pakistan that allotted them office spaces on a single road
in Pindi. Also that they were deliberately allotted offices in Pindi and
not in nearby Islamabad where they would have constantly been under the
gaze of international public opinion; and that this would have been
embarrassing to the Pakistan government also.
The public meeting
organised by JLF in Rawalpindi Press Club was a crowded one, with several
comrades coming from the North West Frontier Province and other places.
The Indian delegation’s visit to Pakistan was a moral booster to comrades
in these places; many of them had got inactive or joined the NGOs came
forward to contact the JLF parties. One of such veterans, for example, was
Mukhtar Wacha who remained with us in Islamabad and also came over to
Karachi.
A slightly
unpleasant situation developed here as CMKP activists came to have a
verbal clash with a group that had left the party two years ago. This
breakaway group is in favour of supporting the Musharraf regime, on the
understanding that a weakening of this regime would mean a fundamentalist
take-over.
As soon as we
reached the Marriot Hotel in Islamabad, our status changed. For the next
40 odd hours now, we were the guests of the Pakistan government.
In the evening, the
Pakistan Chapter of SAFMA organised yet another reception to the
delegation in this hotel that stands face to face with the Marghalla Hills
of scenic beauty. As we were now state guests, the original JLF programme
that the CPP would host a dinner for us, had to be cancelled.
OUR short stay at
Islamabad was no less pleasant even though everyone was tired after the
road journey from Lahore to Islamabad. The weather was pleasant. In fact,
the constant impression since we had landed at Lahore was that the weather
we were encountering was quite good --- natural weather as well as
political.
MARCH 1
The night before, we
were told that Pakistan prime minister, Shri Shaukat Aziz, had invited the
delegation to meet him at 10.30 a m. In the morning, however, the news
came that there was a change in the programme. Now, we were to meet the
president, General Pervez Musharraf, at the same time.
There were some
other changes, too. Soon came the news that the president would meet only
the delegation
leaders, Surjeet and Bardhan. Another change was that he would meet the
leaders not in Aiwan-e-Sadr (President’s House) in Islamabad but at the
General Headquarters in Pindi. Finally, the meeting took place not at
10.30 but only after 12, when we all had reached the Foreign Office.
Honestly speaking,
so many changes baffled me. What could the reason be, I tried to fathom.
Was it necessitated by security concerns? There were, after all, three
attacks on the president last year!
The delegation
leaders’ meeting with the president created a big sensation throughout
Pakistan, and the media covered it prominently. Rather, it was the lead
item in most of the Pakistani papers.
As the only Urdu
speaking persons in the delegation, Shamim Faizee’s and my job was to scan
the Urdu papers, and we scrupulously did this informally assigned job.
What miffed us was that, contrary to English press, Urdu papers had by and
large ignored the delegation. Sometimes a small news in one corner,
sometimes nothing. But they too were constrained to take note of the
leaders’ meeting the president.
Going by comments in
Urdu papers, I could not avoid the feeling that Urdu press was as if
trying hard to persuade itself not to take note of the delegation.
As our readers
already have details of this meeting, we skip it here.
|
MEETING
WITH THE PRESIDENT
Extract from
Harkishan Singh Surjeet's
article
IT was in this
overall context that myself and Bardhan were taken to the General
Headquarters in Rawalpindi to meet President Pervez Musharraf. A
host of the army’s top brass was also present on the occasion. The
hour-long meeting took place in a very cordial atmosphere, slightly
after noon on March 1, followed by a lunch hosted by the foreign
minister.
As was
expected, we talked on numerous issues during the meeting; virtually
all issues having a bearing on Indo-Pak ties came up for discussion.
And General Musharraf must be given his due --- he was candid enough
and did not skirt any issue we raised.
Kashmir and
Baglihar, however, were the focus during the talks. In this context,
the president’s contention was that he was prepared to accept all
the confidence building measures (CBMs) India suggests; he even
stressed that he has instructed his ministers to say yes to whatever
their Indian counterparts may suggest in the CBMs category. But he
also said one has after all to come to a stage where the “conflict
issues” are taken up for resolution. In the last analysis, the
relations between the two countries depended on a resolution of
these very issues, he added.
One thing
needs to be realised --- Kashmir has been made an emotional issue
for Pakistan citizens. This is not surprising as Kashmir is an issue
the army as well as mainstream political parties have
sentimentalised over decades; in fact both of them have thrived upon
it. It has become a tiger ride for them: you cannot afford to
disembark. But this makes it all the more necessary that the issue
should first be desentimentalised. It naturally requires patient
handling. At the same time, because of the nature of the issue, we
felt that what has been hanging fire for 57 years cannot be resolved
overnight, and this we said in so many words. We also told the
president that we would convey his feelings to the leaders of the
government of India, and do whatever we can for its resolution.
As for
Baglihar dam, it was clear that the president was knowledgeable; he
had after all done a dissertation on it years ago when he was a
brigadier in Pakistan army. His complaint was that India was going
on with its construction and that whenever this issue came up for
discussion, India would present Pakistan with a fait accompli.
He also pointed out that water sharing could well become a big bone
of contention between the two countries in future. That his concern
is genuine is not in doubt. Then, there also remains the fact that
hawks in Pakistan are trying to rouse passions on the issue. But the
immediate problem is, and we told him so, that Pakistan has already
referred the issue to the World Bank that had brokered the Sindh
treaty decades back, and that such arbitration may take years to
bear fruit. So our suggestion was that India and Pakistan must find
out whether something can be done for an “out of court” settlement
of the issue --- that is, without involving the World Bank. We also
assured him that we would take up the matter with the government of
India for the sake of a speedy and mutually beneficial solution.
Similar
sentiments were exchanged when we met the prime minister, Shaukat
Aziz, next day, at about 10.30 a m, before proceeding to Karachi.
During the
talks with the president, I raised the issue of the Sikh youth who
were arrested while crossing over into Pakistan. I told the
president that these youth were innocent and had fallen victims to
some fraudulent companies who had doled out promises of lucrative
jobs and duped them. (Many of these youth had inadvertently stranded
into Pakistan from Iran side.) The president’s gesture was touching;
he then and there asked an army officer to release all these youth
after fulfilling technical formalities like nationality
verification. Many of these 200 odd youth have already come back by
the time we write these lines.
The president
was equally considerate on the issue of fishermen who inadvertently
crossed over into Pakistan’s territorial waters and were imprisoned.
As soon as we raised the issue, not only he ordered the release of
these 800 odd fishermen, he also promised that in future too such
fishermen would be released after the verification of their
credentials. “What is the use of imprisoning these poor fellows?
Just give them a few slaps, warn them and let them go!” This was his
advice to his officials. Currently the practice is that, when
releasing such fishermen, Pakistan impounds their boats. Now the
hope is that such fishermen’s vessels would also be released.
This was an
immediate and concrete result of our talks with the president of
Pakistan, and the media in the country prominently carried the news.
Overall,
President Musharraf’s gesture was that he would not go down in
history as “a man who failed,” and that he would like to resolve all
the pending issues with India in his as well as “Comrade Surjeet’s
lifetime.” This was in itself a valuable commitment. And, we hope,
such commitments from the two sides would go a long way in resolving
the thorny and not so thorny issues between the two bigs in South
Asia: in the interest of the two countries and the whole
subcontinent, in the interest of regional and world peace.
|
From Rawalpindi,
Surjeet and Bardhan directly came to the Foreign Office where we were all
waiting for them. A posse of media persons, including some Indian
journalists, was also there. The lunch hosted by foreign minister, Shri
Khurshid Mahmood Qasoori, proceeded in a very cordial atmosphere. Leaders
of the Muslim League (Qaid-e-Azam) and Mahajir Qaumi Movement,
constituents of the ruling combine, also attended.
Here we met Dr
Farooq Sattar, leader of the 18-member MQM group in National Assembly.
(His forefathers were from Gujarat in India.) He was excessively keen that
after reaching Karachi the delegation should take out time to meet a group
of MQM leaders. One may note that the MQM has its base mainly in Sindh,
with Karachi having the biggest concentration of mahajirs
(migrants).
The evening was
devoted to a visit to Gurdwara Panja Sahib at Hasan Abdal in Attock
district and to Taxila that falls in Rawalpindi district. None of these
visits was in our itinerary and we did not have visa for Attock district
either. CPP general secretary Qazi Imdad, its leader Jameel Malik and his
family members accompanied in separate cars. It was quite dark when we
reached Taxila from Hasan Abdal (where the government maintains the
gurdwara and some local Muslims look after it). Moreover, having no prior
information about our arrival, concerned officials had closed the Taxila
Museum. This was a pity as, contrary to communal propaganda, the Pakistan
government has preserved a very large number of relics of the Buddhist
period.
The loss was
somewhat made up by our visit to Sirkap. It was a flourishing town in
ancient days and is about 5 km from the present Taxila town. Here, well
preserved in situ, one may see the ruins of a more than two
millennia old and planned town, about 5 km in length and one km in width.
However, in view of the darkness all around we were advised against going
to the hillock, not very far from Sirkap, where an Ashokan inscription
still stands.
The hectic tour
ended with our arrival at the dinner that was hosted by Shri Raghavan,
India’s deputy high commissioner in Islamabad, at his house. I had already
met Raghavan and his wife, Ranjana Sengupta, in Lahore, and we had
discovered with pleasant surprise that we were students at JNU in the same
period.
MARCH 2
While still at
Lahore, we had tried our best that the three meetings in Islamabad (with
president, prime minister and foreign minister) must be compressed in one
single day, March 1. Several missives were sent to Islamabad for the
purpose. The idea was that in that case we could proceed to Karachi on
March 1 evening, or March 2 morning at the most, and stay there for two
days. But this was not to be. The bureaucracy had its own way.
So, when the leaders
went to meet the prime minister in the forenoon, we found ourselves
without work, so to say. Though it was the first substantial break in a
hectic programme since February 24, it was nothing pleasant to us. We
spent the morning with groups of comrades from various places, whose
number had increased as it was our last day in Islamabad. Several came
down to the airport to see us off.
We also spent a few
hours to go to Daman-e-Koh, a place of exceptional beauty. Developed atop
the Marghala Hills, from here you can see the whole of Islamabad that is
situated only on one side of this hill. I counted the high-rise buildings
of Islamabad --- only eight. Felt good to a person who was fed up with the
view of Delhi skyscrapers.
And then, in the
afternoon, over to Karachi by plane.
The Jinnah Airport
of Karachi was witness to another crowded reception to the CPI(M)-CPI
delegation. Here the JLF had arranged our boarding and lodging. There was
no specific programme in the evening, except loitering.
MARCH 3
The leaders spent
some time meeting a group of PPP, JUI and NAP leaders in the Sindh
Assembly building. The Jamiatul-Ulema-e-Islami (JUI) was formed after the
country’s partition, out of the Jamiatul-Ulema-e-Hind that played a
notable role in the independence movement. It represented the section
which some historians have called “nationalist Muslims,” a misnomer. The
National Awami Party (NAP) is led by a grandson of Khan Abdul Ghaffar
Khan.
Finally, Dr Farooq
Sattar had what he wanted. A group of MQM leaders were there in the group
that met the CPI(M) and CPI leaders.
One of the important
personalities who came to meet Surjeet and Bardhan was Captain Zafarullah
Poshni, the only survivor among the accused of the infamous Rawalpindi
conspiracy case of early 1950s. One will recall that the then Liaqat
government had framed this case to crush the communist movement in the
country.
Bardhan also met Ms
Ghanwa Bhutto, widow of Murtaza Bhutto and leader of the anti-Benazir
faction in the PPP. She was not invited to the programme in the Sindh
Assembly building. An overtired Surjeet could not go to meet her.
The evening saw a
crowded mass meeting in the lawn of Karachi Press Club. It was organised
by the JLF and Karachi Union of Journalists.
The last meeting of
the day --- and during our stay in Pakistan --- was the one in the
auditorium of Pakistan Medical Association, Garden Road. It was organised
by Progressive Writers Association (PWA) in collaboration with two local
level organisations. These are Karwan-e-Amn (Heralds of Peace) and Qalam
Barae-Amn (pen for peace). The former is a group of Catholic clergymen who
run several schools, hospitals, etc, in the country. Among these, the St
Patrick’s High School (established 1861) has the distinction of producing
several luminaries of Pakistan.
It was quite apt
that veteran Sindhi writer Shobho Gyanchandani (95), one of the PWA’s
founders in this part of the undivided country, presided over this
function. PWA general secretary Muslim Shamim conducted the meeting where
Bardhan was the chief guest. Not feeling well, Surjeet could not attend.
After the welcome
address by Reverend Father Joseph Pal of Karwan-e-Amn, Urdu poet G M Felix
‘Qaasir’ Amritsari referred to the recent arrest of six Catholic fishermen
in Gwadar, pleading that Surjeet and Bardhan must do something to get them
released. It was evident that the news of release of a number of youth
from Indian Punjab and Indian fishermen, after Surjeet and Bardhan had
taken up the issue with the Pakistan president, had caught public
imagination all over the country. Since our return from Pakistan, a number
of Punjabi youth and fishermen have been released after completing the
technical formalities; Punjab chief minister Captain Amrinder Singh also
brought back with him a group of 26 youth after their release from jail.
But who can deny that it was the CPI(M)-CPI delegation that had taken up
the matter with President Musharraf!
We left Karachi for
Delhi on March 4 morning, regretting that these seven days had passed too
soon.
The CPI(M)-CPI team
visited Pakistan when we are in the midst of Sajjad Zaheer birth centenary
celebrations. One recalls that late Comrade Sajjad Zaheer, the moving
spirit behind the PWA, was also the first general secretary of Communist
Party of Pakistan and the main accused in the Rawalpindi conspiracy case.
BACK TO APNA WEB
PAGE |