EXCERPT: Tales Of Two Cities
        
        Tale of two cities
        
         Tales
        of Two Cities sets out to tell that story — of independence, of
        upheaval and migration and of new beginnings — through the eyes of two
        observers, whose families were uprooted and who were forced to start new
        lives in new states in those unpropitious circumstances.
Tales
        of Two Cities sets out to tell that story — of independence, of
        upheaval and migration and of new beginnings — through the eyes of two
        observers, whose families were uprooted and who were forced to start new
        lives in new states in those unpropitious circumstances.
        
        Kuldip Nayar, one of the India’s most eminent journalists, was 24
        years old in 1947 when his father had to abandon his solid medical
        practice in the town of Sialkot and the family sought refuge with
        relatives in Delhi. They had initially decided to remain in Pakistan
        after Independence and were strengthened in their resolve by the
        assurances given to the minorities by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan’s
        first Governor-General. However, on Pakistan’s Independence Day,
        August 14, fear gripped the Hindu community in Sialkot so suddenly that
        the family got up from their lunch and left behind almost everything
        they owned. After a spell with friends in the neighbouring cantonment,
        they set off for Delhi, hoping to return once the situation normalised.
        But it was not to be.
        
        Asif Noorani, distinguished Pakistani journalist and critic, was only
        five years old at Partition. He remembers the riots in Bombay and was
        aware of some horrific incidents in his neighbourhood. But the family
        weathered that storm and lived in Bombay for three more years before his
        father decided to migrate to Pakistan in search of work. His father’s
        business partner, the major shareholder in the medical store in which he
        worked, had already left for Pakistan and when his stake was taken over
        by a Hindu migrant from Sind, Asif’s father saw the writing on the
        wall. This was in fact a case of economic migration, undertaken with
        some reluctance, triggered by changing patterns of business ownership,
        and to a greater extent a matter of choice rather than compulsion.
        
        As Asif himself writes: ‘Even those who were not in favour of
        Partition migrated to Pakistan in search of better opportunities’.
        
* * *
        * *
        
The Tales of Two Cities offered by Kuldip Nayar and Asif Noorani
        reflect very different Partition experiences. Kuldip’s migration from
        Sialkot to Delhi across the ethnically cleansed plains of Punjab was a
        very different experience from Asif Noorani’s family passage from
        Bombay to Karachi in 1950 on board the S.S. Sabarmati, a regular steamer
        service which continued to run until the 1965 war.
        
        Their accounts of pre-Partition society and culture naturally reflect
        their age and circumstances at the time. Coming from what he calls ‘a
        secular-minded family of practising Muslims’, the young Asif Noorani
        seems to have been almost unconscious of other religious communities,
        assuming that Hindu school friends at his kindergarten must also be
        Muslims of some sort. Kuldip Nayar, on the other hand, had already
        graduated from the Law College at Lahore, had questioned Mr Jinnah in a
        public meeting and had heard Maulana Azad point out the potential
        pitfalls of Partition for the Muslim community. He was a politically
        conscious young man and had formed a peace committee with his friends in
        Sialkot to help to preserve good relations between the communities. —
        David Page
        
        From Sialkot to Delhi
        
        I did not want to leave Sialkot city. This was my home. I was born and
        brought up here. Why could not I, a Hindu, live in the Islamic state of
        Pakistan when there would be hundreds of thousands of Muslims residing
        in India? True, religion was the basis of Partition. But then both the
        Congress and the Muslim League, the main political parties, had opposed
        the exchange of population. People could stay wherever they were. Then
        why on August 14, 1947 was I unwelcome at a place where my forefathers
        and their forefathers had lived for decades?
        
        Our family had other reasons to stay back. Most patients of my father, a
        medical practitioner, were Muslims. My best friend, Shafquat, with whom
        I had grown up, lived in Sialkot. At his mere wish I had tattooed on my
        right arm, the Islamic insignia — the crescent and star. I was a
        graduate in Persian. Pakistan had declared Urdu as its official
        language, with which I felt at home. We had a large property and a
        retinue of servants. Where would we go if we were to uproot ourselves?
        
        Then our spiritual guardian was there. It was not a superstition but our
        faith that the grave in our back garden was that of a Pir who protected
        us and guided the family whenever it faced troubles. How could we leave
        the Pir? The grave was our refuge. We always found relief there. Our Ma,
        whenever harried or harassed or after her quarrels with our father, ran
        to the grave for solace. We, three brothers and one sister, bowed before
        the Pir every Thursday in reverence and lit an earthen lamp. It was our
        temple. The people of Sialkot were mild, austere and tolerant. They were
        cast in a different mould. Our religions or positions in life did not
        distance us from one another. We numbered about a lakh: 70 per cent
        Muslims and 30 per cent Hindus, Sikhs and Christians. As far as I could
        remember, we had never experienced tension, much less communal riots.
        Our festivals, Diwali, Holi or Eid, were jointly celebrated and most of
        us walked together in mourning during Moharram. Even our businesses
        depended on cooperative effort. There was a mixture of owners and
        workers from both communities.
        
        Even at the height of the agitation over the demand for Pakistan,
        Sialkot did not experience any tension. Every day was like any other day
        and business was as usual. The Muslim League had probably taken out two
        or three processions for separation, like the ones the Congress party
        had for Independence. But there was no trouble. A few pebbles thrown
        into the water disturbed it for while. Otherwise, it was placid.
         
        
        It was great to be alive. There was still daylight. As I looked
        out, relieved and happy, I saw people walking in the opposite direction.
        They were Muslims. I saw the same pain etched on their faces. They
        trudged along with their belongings bundled on their heads and their
        frightened children trailing behind. They too had left behind their home
        and hearth, friends and hopes. They too had been broken on the wrack of
        history. A caravan from our side was going to Pakistan. We stopped to
        make way for them. They too stopped. But no one spoke. We looked at one
        another with sympathy, not fear. A strange understanding cropped up
        between us. It was a spontaneous kinship, of hurt, loss and
        helplessness. Both were refugees.
         
        
        There was a burst of happiness when Pakistan came into being. The
        Muslim population was on top of the world. The Sikhs were depressed. But
        most people took the whole thing in their stride. The atmosphere
        deteriorated only when Muslims ousted from India began pouring in and
        when it dawned on the Muslim population that they had an independent
        country of their own.
        
        Yet there was no tension, not even a twinge of enmity. We spoke the same
        Punjabi. The Punjabi we spoke in Sialkot had a peculiar accent. I
        discovered this when I met Nawaz Sharif, then chief minister, for the
        first time at Delhi in the 1990s. It took him no time to tell me that I
        was from Sialkot. He said that the way in which I spoke Punjabi had a
        distinctive twang, a kind of accent, which was confined to the
        Sialkotees. I was in good company: the Subcontinent’s two great Urdu
        poets, Mohammed Iqbal and Faiz Ahmed Faiz, who were from Sialkot, spoke
        Punjabi in the same way. I had heard Iqbal one day at his mohalla,
        Imambara, where Shafquat had taken me. I was a child then and I never
        went near him out of fear. Even otherwise I would not have approached
        him at that time because he was speaking angrily in Punjabi. All that I
        remembered about him was his huge girth, sitting on a charpai (or string
        bed), which almost touched the ground because of his weight.
        
* * *
        * *
        
WE had killed one million of one another and uprooted 20 million.
        Temples, mosques and gurdwaras had been demolished in hundreds. The
        Subcontinent’s composite culture and pluralistic society going back
        hundreds of years lay in tatters.
        
        It was late in the afternoon when the jeep reached the outskirts of
        Lahore. It halted there. We were told that a caravan of Muslims had been
        attacked at Amritsar and that the Muslims in Lahore were waiting on the
        roadside to take revenge. We got down and waited in fear and silence.
        There was some stray shooting in the distance. The stench of decomposed
        flesh from nearby fields hung in the air. We could hear people shouting
        slogans: Allah Ho Akbar, Ya Ali and Pakistan Zindabad. But it was far
        away. We set off again.
        
        There was nervousness as we approached the border. And then we heard
        Bharat Mata Ki Jai. We drove past the hurriedly erected whitewashed
        drums and the Indian flag on a bamboo pole that marked the border. There
        was rejoicing and people on the Indian side hugged one another.
        
        It was great to be alive. There was still daylight. As I looked out,
        relieved and happy, I saw people walking in the opposite direction. They
        were Muslims. I saw the same pain etched on their faces. They trudged
        along with their belongings bundled on their heads and their frightened
        children trailing behind. They too had left behind their home and
        hearth, friends and hopes. They too had been broken on the wrack of
        history. A caravan from our side was going to Pakistan. We stopped to
        make way for them. They too stopped. But no one spoke. We looked at one
        another with sympathy, not fear. A strange understanding cropped up
        between us. It was a spontaneous kinship, of hurt, loss and
        helplessness. Both were refugees.
        
        The railway platform at Amritsar was so crowded that it was difficult to
        move without requesting someone to make way. People obliged quickly. Had
        the tragedy made them humane or had it taught them humility? It was so
        noisy that I had to shout at the top of my voice to make myself heard.
        
        I did not know where they — hundreds of them — were going. Every
        train which arrived would be full in no time. I waited for the Frontier
        Mail to go to Delhi. I had to use all my force to get in. Squeezing in
        the bag required even greater strength.
        
        I was taken for a Muslim in the 2nd Class compartment in which I rode.
        Non-Sikh Punjabis on both sides looked alike. They dressed in the same
        way. They ate the same food and even behaved in the same way. Everyone
        was condemning their leaders for letting them down. But I was abusing
        them at the top of my voice. I got attention, no doubt, but also some
        hostile looks.
        
        My bare right arm flashed the crescent and star which I had got tattooed
        at Sialkot. I heard whispers of suspicion about my identity. Was he a
        Muslim abusing loudly to cover up his religion? The tattoo heightened
        the suspicion and convinced more and more people in the compartment that
        I was Muslim.
        
        I was pulled out at Ludhiana, coincidentally the city where most people
        from Sialkot had migrated. Burly Sikhs with spears and swords joined a
        hostile crowd around me at the platform. I was asked to prove that I was
        a Hindu. I could see blood in their eyes. Before I could pull my pants
        down, a halwai (sweet-meat seller) from Sialkot, from our locality
        itself, came to my rescue. He shouted that I was Doctor Sahib’s son.
        Another joined him to confirm and the unbelieving people dispersed. This
        ended my agony as well as the excitement of the spectators. I was let
        off. But those few minutes still haunt me. There was no mercy those
        days. — Kuldip Nayar
        
        From Bombay to Karachi
        
        For someone born in 1942, Independence and Partition remain a somewhat
        hazy memory. However, I distinctly remember being taken by my father to
        see the illuminations on some buildings. We enjoyed the view from the
        upper storey of a double-decker bus in Bombay. That was perhaps on the
        eve of independence. I also recall the parade of the armed forces, a
        year later. The smartly turned out soldiers passed through Pydhonie, not
        too far from where we lived.
        
        My pre-Independence memory is restricted to raising the then popular
        slogan ‘Up, up the national flag; down, down the Union Jack’ with
        other boys, after school hours, for many days. The only Jack I knew in
        those days was the one who went up the hill with Jill for that was my
        favourite nursery rhyme. I am sure most of the slogan-raisers from the
        missionary school, St Joseph’s High School at Umerkhadi in Bombay
        were, like me, unaware of the meaning of the slogan and even the
        significance of Independence. When someone asked me why I was chanting
        the slogan, I said because all my friends were doing it. I was at that
        time in what they called the Infant Class, the junior-most in the
        school.
        
        I had earlier been to a kindergarten school called Dawoodbhoy Fazalbhoy
        School, which was run by the Ismailis (followers of the Aga Khan). It
        was a good enough school but I didn’t like it for two reasons. For one
        thing, they served only vegetarian food at lunch time and, for another,
        all the kids were made to take an afternoon nap. I was too restless to
        sleep at what were odd hours to me. I simply couldn’t close my eyes
        and was often punished for not letting my ‘neighbours’ — the kids
        lying beside me — go to sleep either. Eventually, a mattress was laid
        down for me in one corner of the room so that I could not disturb my
        classmates. My monthly reports said ‘good’ in all subjects and
        ‘very good’ in English but ‘bad’ in the column for conduct.
        
        Though the school was in a predominantly Muslim locality, children from
        Hindu families were in significant numbers too. But when the communal
        riots began, some Hindu children moved to schools in what their parents
        thought were ‘safer’ environs.
        
        St Joseph’s School, where my parents had both studied, was in what was
        considered a Hindu muhalla, but it had never seen any riots, at least
        not while we were in Bombay — until September 1950. Communal
        disturbances in those days were mostly confined to such areas as Dadar,
        Parel, Kalbadevi, Gol Pitha, Madanpura and Bhindi Bazaar.
        
        My best friend in those days at St Joseph’s was a boy called Subhash
        Thorat. All I remember of him, apart from his name, is his crew cut and
        a question that I asked him: ‘Are you a Shia or a Sunni?’ He
        replied: ‘I don’t know. I’ll ask my father.’ I somehow thought
        that Hindus could be Shias or Sunnis too. I wasn’t sure who I was. I
        still wonder how the classification of the two main Islamic sects
        entered my mind, for ours was a secular-minded family of practising
        Muslims. Sects, castes and communal differences didn’t matter to my
        elders, which is something I inherited from them.
        
        The same question was asked four or five years later in Lahore after we
        migrated to Pakistan but this time I was at the receiving end. A girl
        from my class, with whom I shared my sweets, posed the same question.
        ‘I guess I am a Sunni,’ I said. ‘Well, then I am a Shia. Remember!
        I can’t marry a Sunni boy,’ she responded with a grim face. I
        wasn’t particularly interested in marrying her, at least not at the
        age of ten, but I did lament the loss of an option.
        
* * *
        * *
        
 One
        incident, which is deeply etched on my memory, is the news of the
        assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. My parents were particularly worried
        about the safety of my uncle, Malik Noorani, and his wife, Mumtaz
        Noorani, both hardened leftists, who had gone to Delhi to attend the
        wedding of poet Ali Sardar Jafri and Sultana at that time. Everyone
        feared that the assassin was a Muslim, so the marriage party was
        disrupted and all those present, including the newlyweds, fearing the
        outbreak of a communal riot, rushed to safer places. When it was
        confirmed that the assassin was a Hindu, policemen in trucks announced
        on their megaphones: ‘Gandhiji ka qatal kisi Musulman ne naheen balke
        eik Hindu ne kiya hai.’ (Gandhiji was not assassinated by a Muslim,
        but by a Hindu). Thus, what could have led to as bloody a riot as the
        anti-Sikh riot in Delhi in 1984, after the two Sikh bodyguards of Indira
        Gandhi opened fire at her, was averted by the presence of mind shown by
        the authorities.
One
        incident, which is deeply etched on my memory, is the news of the
        assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. My parents were particularly worried
        about the safety of my uncle, Malik Noorani, and his wife, Mumtaz
        Noorani, both hardened leftists, who had gone to Delhi to attend the
        wedding of poet Ali Sardar Jafri and Sultana at that time. Everyone
        feared that the assassin was a Muslim, so the marriage party was
        disrupted and all those present, including the newlyweds, fearing the
        outbreak of a communal riot, rushed to safer places. When it was
        confirmed that the assassin was a Hindu, policemen in trucks announced
        on their megaphones: ‘Gandhiji ka qatal kisi Musulman ne naheen balke
        eik Hindu ne kiya hai.’ (Gandhiji was not assassinated by a Muslim,
        but by a Hindu). Thus, what could have led to as bloody a riot as the
        anti-Sikh riot in Delhi in 1984, after the two Sikh bodyguards of Indira
        Gandhi opened fire at her, was averted by the presence of mind shown by
        the authorities.
        
        I remember clearly that one morning my father, who used to go out every
        day to pick up freshly baked bread and the day’s copy of The Times of
        India, entered the house with a sullen face. He announced the death of
        Quaid-e-Azam, Muhammed Ali Jinnah. My knowledge of Mr Jinnah was
        confined to the slogans which some people in the neighbourhood used to
        raise: ’Quaid-e-Azam zindabad, Pakistan paindabad’. But after
        Partition the slogans died down — discretion being the better part of
        valour.
        
* * *
        * *
        
When I compare Mumbai and Karachi, I sometimes feel they are twins
        that were separated at birth. The white collar workers and the labour
        class in both countries make a beeline for these two great cities.
        It’s a Gold Rush kind of a situation. The weather in both the cities
        is moderate, except that Karachi doesn’t get even half as much rain as
        Mumbai, and both suffer from increasing congestion and pressure on
        services. Every time I go to Mumbai I find it more claustrophobic. The
        traffic, though more disciplined than in Karachi, drives me crazy
        particularly during the rush hour. When I visited the city in 2007, it
        took me an hour and a half to reach South Mumbai from the airport with
        the result that I could not visit friends and relatives living in places
        like Bandra and Juhu, not to speak of more far flung suburbs during my
        short stay.
        
        Mumbai scores a major point over Karachi in its control of crime. There
        are occasional gunfights between Mafia groups in Mumbai but otherwise it
        is city free from major crimes. Robberies are much less in number and
        cars are not snatched at gunpoint. The one plus-point that Karachi has
        is that you don’t find people walking without shoes, nor do you see
        people sleeping on pavements. People sleeping on pavements in Mumbai are
        a sore sight.
        
        Karachi and Mumbai have both been plagued by bomb blasts, but megacities
        as they are, the unaffected areas continue to function more or less
        normally. Besides, they are both highly resilient. All said and done,
        there is no city in the world I love to visit more than Mumbai but if I
        am asked to choose between Mumbai and Karachi my vote will go to
        Karachi. In fact, after more than fifty years as a resident, I have come
        to feel about Karachi in much the same way as Milton wrote about England
        — ‘With all thy faults, I love thee still.’— Asif Noorani
        
         
        
        Excerpted with permission from
        Tales of Two Cities
        By Kuldip Nayar and Asif Noorani
        Roli Books, New Delhi Available at
        Liberty Books, Karachi
        126pp. Rs545
        
        
        
      
       
          
      BACK TO APNA WEB PAGE