![]()
|
by
Nonika Singh
WHEN a man decides to
pen his autobiography, it would seem as if he is trying to seal his
greatness. However, the Mansa-based noted theatre person Ajmer Singh
Aulakh, rooted to terra firma, nurses no such delusions of grandeur. So,
even though his life story that has spanned several milestones is
awe-inspiring, he doesn’t think his achievements by themselves deserve
to be remembered by posterity. The rationale behind writing an
autobiography, he states simply is: "For this would help others,
especially students doing research on my work to understand my plays
better. For my plays are a reflection of my experiences." Indeed, the man,
whose plays are known as much for their rustic flavour and authentic
‘Malwai’ dialect as for the complexity of rural issues, does agree
with the presumption that one can write from imagination alone.
"There are men born with such rare felicity, perhaps, but I draw
inspiration from what I have experienced and seen." So, time and
again his pen has moved to bare the predicament and the anguish of
marginal farmers or the rural working class. Interestingly, even as a
small boy growing up in Kishangarh Pharwahi village he wrote poems that
brimmed with Leftist ideology and sang them with full gusto at many
platforms of communist parties. In between, he even churned out a
‘totally forgettable’ novel and some short stories. For years, he
didn’t realise his muse lay in play writing and direction. It was only
when he began teaching Punjabi at Says he: "As I
observed the reaction of the audiences, I realised that people responded
more to my skit items or mono acts." Soon, he began to write small
plays for his college students. Presto, wherever the play was staged at
youth festivals or other inter-college competitions, it won a first prize.
Spurred by encouraging words from men like the novelist Gurdyal Singh and
critic T.R. Vinod, his theatre group, Lok Kalā Manch, Mansa, was born in
1976 and has over 1,000 theatre performances to its credit. Having written
over 35 plays, many of which are part of the university syllabi, Aulakh
has always voiced the concerns of the dispossessed and challenged
obscurantist beliefs. Often, he has taken a cue from the lines of Gurbani
or Sufi wisdom and championed the true essence of Sikhism. Rues he:
"Sikhism is first and foremost a proponent of equality.
Unfortunately, feudal elements try to project it differently." Thus, his play Ishaq
Baajh Namāz De Hajj Nahi conveys how deeds and not rituals take one
closer to the intrinsic philosophy of Sikhism. While some of his plays
have revolved around fake encounters (Yaarhe Da Sathar),
militancy (Anhe Nishānchi), the most outstanding leitmotif of his
work has been the manner in which he establishes the link between economic
compulsions and social and family relationships. And what is remarkable is
that his plays like Bagāne Boharh Di Chhān have received both
critical acclaim from thick-skinned theatre critics and the adulation of
rural masses. Of course, the man, who has received many honours like the
Sangeet Natak Akademi Award, Shiromani Natak-kaar Award by the Language
Department, Punjab, Sahitya Akademi Award, Pash Memorial Award, has not
been spared the barbs either. On the charge that
his plays are deeply entrenched in the Malwa belt and, thus, lack
universal appeal, he quips: "I don’t think there is anything called
universal truth. Truth is always relative, and has to be viewed from a
particular perspective. Even to understand Shakespeare you need to
understand the background of the times he lived in." Not that he is
comparing himself to Shakespeare. On the contrary, he feels that one must
understand one’s limitations and work within that ambit. And his chosen
circle is the farming community. He asserts: "Some detractors might
think I am repeating myself but even today I feel there are many aspects
of farmers’ problems which have not been dwelt upon." Land
acquisition, he agrees, has opened up a Pandora’s box and thrown up
concerns which are weighing on his mind. Yes, he does intend to write a
play on it. But Aulakh
doesn’t believe in knee-jerk response to incidents or situations. Though
extremely perturbed by the Maoist problem he would rather sit and watch
before drawing any parallel with [Courtesy:
Sunday Tribune, September 12, 2010 |